Archive for calnetalk.com The place to find new friends and meet up with old ones
|

Durgan
|
Use of Tazers.Tasers are under review. This is the old cattle prod which no self respecting farmer would use on his animals. The RCMP are out of control. This has the appearance of a mafia style execution.
Durgan.
http://uxeif.notlong.com
http://uzehu.notlong.com
Tasered man's last moments
IAN BAILEY
Globe and Mail Update
November 14, 2007 at 10:18 PM EST
VANCOUVER — Astonishing video footage released yesterday shows Polish immigrant Robert Dziekanski did not resist police or confront them before officers zapped him with a taser, setting off a struggle that ended in his death in the international arrivals area of Vancouver's International Airport.
The footage, shot by Victoria resident Paul Pritchard, was released to the news media yesterday and widely broadcast, providing a raw look at events that have prompted a furious debate in B.C. about the police use of tasers.
The release comes exactly a month after the incident that ended in the death of 40-year-old Mr. Dziekanski, who had come to Canada on his first-ever airplane flight to begin a new life here with his mother, who lives in Kamloops and had been eagerly awaiting his arrival.
He began acting erratically after more than 10 hours being processed — the footage picks up as he was positioning chairs and a table in a manner that caused the automatic doors to remain open. Security guards look on.
Enlarge Image
Paul Pritchard, 25, who witnessed and recorded the death of Robert Dziekanski at the Vancouver International Airport, holds the video camera he used to capture the event, after a press conference at his lawyer's office in Victoria in this Nov. 1, 2007 file photo. (Deddeda Stemler/CP)
Related Articles
From the archives
Tasers: Could paranoid rage be the real killer?
Taser-related deaths since 2003
Task force rejects call to stop using tasers in Quebec
Quebecker dies several days after taser shock
Taser victim likely confused, mother says
Globe editorial: Time to recognize the risks of tasers
When four Mounties arrive, they briskly move up to Mr. Dziekanski. He calls out "policia, policia" as they approach. One bystander is recorded saying that he is speaking Russian.
He appears to turn and move away from officers, putting up his hands in frustration. He appears to pick up a stapler on a counter. He is then tasered with a 50,000-volt shock, and jittering he drops, screaming in pain.
Someone yells "hit him again." He was tasered twice. Police pile on, seeking to restrain him. One officer places his knee on Mr. Dziekanski's neck.
Mr. Dziekanski went into medical distress and died there. The footage shows officers attending to him. One man in a suit checks for a pulse. It is impossible to tell from the footage whether he is dead at that point, although he appears non-responsive.
An autopsy later found no sign of drugs or alcohol in Mr. Dziekanski's system, but failed to come up with any specific cause of death.
His mother, Zofia Cisowski, had gone home to the B.C. Interior after waiting several hours to meet her son.
The footage was especially horrifying to Ms. Cisowski. Her lawyer said she had watched parts selected for her by a friend.
"She's profoundly saddened seeing her son look frightened and in need of help and wanting help," Walter Kosteckyj said in an interview shortly before he released copies of the video to the media by arrangement with Mr. Pritchard.
"She would have expected that he would have got that help from the police, but clearly he did not."
Mr. Kosteckyj said his client would not watch TV news broadcasts for a while to avoid seeing the images, although she had wanted to view them on her own terms.
"You want to be able to, if possible, see the last moments of your child's life and see what, if anything, you could do, and what could have been done."
He said she has been resigned to the release of the video. "Whether it got out now or four months from now, she knew that it was going to come out, and that's just the reality of modern life," he said.
Mr. Kosteckyj said it's too soon to comment on legal action, although he has been talking to witnesses to prepare for a planned coroner's inquest. He said people have called him from as far away as Texas to offer their comments on what they saw.
"I was expecting to see a confrontation, a discussion and things go sideways, then the tasering. That's not what you see," he said.
"The biggest thing that surprises me is there were four professional police officers there, and that the four officers showed up on the scene, [and] none of them seemed to take the time, not one of them, to go and talk to the crowd of people, the witnesses that were there and get some background on what was going on," he said.
He urged people to watch the video and draw their own conclusions.
A spokesman for the integrated homicide investigation team, which is investigating the incident, urged the public to await the coroner's inquest and consider the video in the context of evidence that will include officers explaining their conduct.
But Corporal Dale Carr, a spokesman for the police team investigating the incident, conceded that may be a futile request. "People are going to form their opinions. They are going to make their conclusions and I, unfortunately, don't expect I can control that."
Asked about the absence of attempts to defuse the situation with conversation, Cpl. Carr said, "That's part of what we are trying to get to the bottom of, what was going through these officers' minds, what did they choose, and why they chose the intervention they did."
He said the investigation is about 30 to 45 days away from completion.
Cpl. Carr said he was especially sympathetic to Ms. Cisowski despite her criticisms of the police.
"I don't want to counter what she has to say. She's a grieving mother who tried for years to get her son to come to Canada, and upon his arrival he ended up deceased. It's a tragic story, and she's entitled to her opinion."
|
rosco
|
Not quite sure what you want in the way of a reply, in a Calne forum?
In the UK, from what I've seen written, Tasers are only carried by armed police (a small percentage of the total) and are used as a later resort. They seem a good idea rather than shooting someone with a gun to me!
Advantage of UK system that I see is that only specially trained police use them: they give Tasers and guns to any old cop in Canada and the US, and often they seem to use Taser people when they can't be bothered to try anything else. And especially using it several times on the trot - I can't understand doing that.
|
Local lass
|
I think it would be a good idea if are cops carried tazers and guns.The us do but they have so much more crime than what we do here.
The big city cops should carry guns in the uk.
|
Durgan
|
| Local lass wrote: | I think it would be a good idea if are cops carried tazers and guns.The us do but they have so much more crime than what we do here.
The big city cops should carry guns in the uk. |
I suspect the UK police act more like policeman should than in NA. Our police are beginning to act like a military, and police work is put on the back burner. Our police are geting too close to a military organization for comfort. The police are tending to approach a situation in attack mode, without diffusing a situation, esculation is often the result, with consequences. Eventually every citizen is approached as if they are a potentil violent criminal. This mind-set is dangerous.
There has to be a distinct difference between a policeman and a soldier. They serve distinctly different functions.
Canada is fast becoming a mirror of the US, and this does not bode well for the citizens. Our Government is tending to ape the US, since 9/11. It makes people uneasy.
|
Local lass
|
Our police here dugan is a waste of time they would sooner get you on a speeding ticket than do any real crime fighting.
it has been reported that two million crimes are not delt with.#
not sure if canada is like it but the uk is so pc minded that they are more afraid of upsetting anyone than what they are catching crime.
|
Bear
|
Could you answer a question please Durgan. I beleive in the US that it is a legal right for anyone to be able to bear arms is it the same in Canada. If so my point would be that you have to fight gun crime from the opposite direction in other words remove the guns from the public before you will be able to remove them from the police.
|
rosco
|
As I recall, Canada is different from the US and you do not have the same right to bear arms.
Having visited both countries, I felt a lot safer in Canada than US as a result of this, I am surprised if Durgan thinks it is as bad as US.
|
Durgan
|
| rosco wrote: | As I recall, Canada is different from the US and you do not have the same right to bear arms.
Having visited both countries, I felt a lot safer in Canada than US as a result of this, I am surprised if Durgan thinks it is as bad as US. |
My reference to "bad" is the actions of police.
Hey, I am not concerned about crime in Canada. I am more concerned about the thug action of the Police. They are out of control. Video cameras are bringing more police to justice for the use of excesssive force.
Recently an RCMP Office shot a man in the back of the head in an interrogation rooom, with the camera turned off, and got away with it.
The Police investigations constantly cover up by delay, bloviating nonsense, and practices almost childish. The Special Investigation Units are a farce, and only the most gullible believe the reports of their long delayed investigations.
A far as beng safe in Canada, I have travelled and worked many times to every city in this country, and always felt safe, and for that matter most cities of the USA.
Guns are mostly an issue with the illegal drug groups. Mostly Jamaican immigrants, Asian Growers, and the usual punks. Gun violence is mostly media hype from where I sit. Sort of a terrorist under every bed idea to keep the populace hyper. I suspect more people are concerned about pedophiles than guns by a large margin. It depends on what the media is hyping on any particular day.
Durgan.
|
rosco
|
Erm, ok: I understand what you are saying, but may I ask what relevance an article about Canadian police has to a Calne forum?
|
Durgan
|
| rosco wrote: | Erm, ok: I understand what you are saying, but may I ask what relevance an article about Canadian police has to a Calne forum?  |
Don't you have tasers in the UK? Maybe even Calne Police have some. I might add this is the debating room, and not only Calne topics. There is even a separate thread for only Calne Topics.
Are you suggesting tha only subjects to be discussed be within the Calne community on this Calnetalk Forum?
I'm here to exchange ideas with hopefully a group that might have a different take on my own views. It's called expanding the mind.
The Taser video of the incident in Vancouver was on the BBC, CNN and all through the EC. The person zapped and murdered by the RCMP was a Polish citizen. I suggest this may be of interest to some people in Calne.
calnetalk
The place to find new friends and meet up with old ones.
Durgan.
|
rosco
|
| Durgan wrote: |
Don't you have tasers in the UK? Maybe even Calne Police have some. I might add this is the debating room, and not only Calne topics. There is even a separate thread for only Calne Topics.
Are you suggesting tha only subjects to be discussed be within the Calne community on this Calnetalk Forum?
I'm here to exchange ideas with hopefully a group that might have a different take on my own views. It's called expanding the mind.
The Taser video of the incident in Vancouver was on the BBC, CNN and all through the EC. The person zapped and murdered by the RCMP was a Polish citizen. I suggest this may be of interest to some people in Calne.
calnetalk
The place to find new friends and meet up with old ones.
Durgan. |
Yes, some UK police do have Taser (see earlier replies).
I haven't seen the video yet, but you do already seem to have made up you mind, referring to the person being murdered by the thuggish RMP. If that is what they wanted to do, they would have shot him with a gun surely?
I personally don't know anyone that has talked about this incident and I wouldn't have known about it had you not posted it here. In all honesty, it does have little applicability or interest to me - I have no information to judge whether the RMP are a good or a bad force: it's not a topic of conversation that has ever come up and I wouldn't certainly judge them just on this one event.
What does get my curiosity going is how come this person was waiting 10 hours to be processed, and no-one else managed to deal with the situation before the police arrived. That seems more important to clarify in this story to me.
|
Durgan
|
>What does get my curiosity going is how come this person was waiting 10 hours to be processed, and no-one else managed to deal with the situation before the police arrived. That seems more important to clarify in this story to me.<
The man ( Polish) didn't speak English. The people at the airport ignored him. He was in secure no-mans land. The area between immigration and where one goes through customs at all international airports. Why he was not approached and addressed is not explained as yet.
The Police in this country has often been accused of misconduct,and always get off due to the closing of ranks. Some of the cases have been so blantant that they defy credulity. There has been ineffectual attempts to curb this practice, without successs.
This episode has been one of the few cases caught on camera, otherwise it would be simply a minor mention in the newspaper. The video speaks for itself. Now the RCMP have to work a spin. It will be intereting to see how it unfolds.
Justice is alway of interest to me, and abuse of authority in particular. With the Internet the information of officialdom cannot be simply broadcast. It can now be discussed and dissected.
|
Durgan
|
The Investigation is proceeding ( Read Spin or Cover-up).For what reasons are the RCMP wanting to go to Poland and seek his medical and criminal history?
http://oobigh.notlong.com
It serves no useful purpose! The ONLY purpose that it could serve is to discredit the man in the eyes of the Canadian Public! to discredit the victim is to justify an inexcusable action on the part of those officers! When will our politicians learn that no thing they can do or say changes the REALITY of the video! You saw it! I saw it! 25 seconds to death! Now they want to discredit the man? Are those in charge not now flying their colours?
Surely this is the lowest of the lowest endeauvors.
But there may be light at the end of the tunnel. Poland has laws to the effect that people can be charged in Poland if one of their citizens is abused in another country. It would be entertaining to say the least if the four horseman were tried in a Polsih court.
I also read the BBC Daily On-line.
|
Durgan
|
This TASER event is gettin wide-spread coverge in NA.http://eyohk.notlong.com Police in action, using a taser.
Driver Tased For Asking Officer Why He Was Stopped
Man who refused to sign speeding ticket because he did not understand what it was is tased and arrested by officer who then refused to read him his rights.
http://infowars.net/articles/november2007/211107Tased.htm)
The video was obtained using "Access to information" and the driver posted it on UTube.
http://truthnottasers.blogspot.com/ Cover-up by taser manufacture.
Pam Schreiner, who worked for the Arizona-based maker of the electric-shock weapons in 2004, says she was threatened and intimidated, including her home being shot at, after she saw company officials intentionally shredding Taser injury reports during a legal proceeding, according to court documents.
|
rosco
|
Durgan,
are you against Taser, RMP or both? I'm a bit confused about the purpose of this thread for you.
|
Durgan
|
| rosco wrote: | Durgan,
are you against Taser, RCMP or both? I'm a bit confused about the purpose of this thread for you. |
View the videos and them comment. I suggest the videos speak for themselves.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a time and place for TAZERS, but certaily not in the hands of every policeman. I certainly don't have enough confidence in the boys in blue to give them all a license; in fact, many shouldn't even be carrying guns-but that is for another discussion.
When the tazer first appeared on the scene, the propaganda was that it would be used in place of the gun, and would reduce fatalities. Nobody could disagree with this idea.
But in practice the taser is now being used as a sort of human control. The public was probably not aware of this practice. Taser use has suddenly become part of the police arsenal of subduing methods, and has even replaced the main weapon TALKING.
The four RCMP who used that weapon in Vancouver displayed in vivid detail the mind-set of the police as to just how the weapon is utilized. I believe the four RCMP thought they were justified in using the TASER in the Vancouver disaster. It is the force rules of engagement that is at fault, and the powers-to-be will have to admit this, or sacrifice the four officers.
The taser is being used in such a casual manner now, that there are no maintained records of it use.
The taser should probably not be banned, but rules of use should be stringent, and every time it is used, a full SIU investigation should be necessary.
The disaster in Vancouver also enraged the public, probably unfairly to some degree, since many are concerned about the lack of oversight of our police forces. Seldom if ever is policeman convicted of malfeasance unless a private video is presented.
The police themselves are responsible often in covering up the actions of rogue police. There has been too many clearly wrong-doings by the police, that have been viewed by the public as cover-ups.
I suggest this disaaster in Vancouver should be taken by all in authority as a wake-up call. The sheeple have spoken loud and clear, and are now demanding changes.
|
rosco
|
I'm against arming the police as a matter of course, and much prefer the UK model in that respect, where armed police are a highly trained specialist unit.
My encounters with armed police always make me feel a bit nervous, it's hard to feel comfortable in their presence (both in the UK and abroad).
I'm sure I've read somewhere that more officers in the US are killed by their own guns than by others firing at them, I wonder if the same in Canada. Where officers have them as the normal issue, I am sure they become blasé about it and standards will slip.
Taser itself should be used as a later resort, not the first thing to try. I 'm not sure that you need a full investigation every time one is used, but you certainly shouldn't zap someone just because they are a bit argumentative or annoying - that seems to be how they are seen and used in North America.
The company itself suffers from having a monopoly in the market (with fairly close links to US government I wouldn't be surprised) and I think not unsurprising that they might not be forthcoming with all evidence against them.
If the choice is between using Taser or shooting someone, it's got to be Taser as the better choice: I don't think it is dangerous in itself from what's been published so far.
|
Durgan
|
This was the first cop. The Magna Carta of Policing.
Durgan.
Sir Robert Peel's Principles of Good Policing (1829)The Nine Principles of Policing
1. To prevent crime and disorder, as an alternative to their repression by military force and severity of legal punishment.
2. To recognise always that the power of the police to fulfil their functions and duties is dependent on public approval of their existence, actions and behaviour and on their ability to secure and maintain public respect.
3. To recognise always that to secure and maintain the respect and approval of the public means also the securing of the willing co-operation of the public in the task of securing observance of laws.
4. To recognise always that the extent to which the co-operation of the public can be secured diminishes proportionately the necessity of the use of physical force and compulsion for achieving police objectives.
5. To seek and preserve public favour, not by pandering to public opinion; but by constantly demonstrating absolutely impartial service to law, in complete independence of policy, and without regard to the justice or injustice of the substance of individual laws, by ready offering of individual service and friendship to all members of the public without regard to their wealth or social standing, by ready exercise of courtesy and friendly good humour; and by ready offering of individual sacrifice in protecting and preserving life.
6. To use physical force only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and warning is found to be insufficient to obtain public co-operation to an extent necessary to secure observance of law or to restore order, and to use only the minimum degree of physical force which is necessary on any particular occasion for achieving a police objective.
7. To maintain at all times a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and that the public are the police, the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.
8. To recognise always the need for strict adherence to police-executive functions, and to refrain from even seeming to usurp the powers of the judiciary of avenging individuals or the State, and of authoritatively judging guilt and punishing the guilty.
9. To recognise always that the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, and not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with them.
|
Durgan
|
| rosco wrote: |
If the choice is between using Taser or shooting someone, it's got to be Taser as the better choice: I don't think it is dangerous in itself from what's been published so far. |
There has been about 300 deaths in the USA and 18 in Canada, since the TAZER introduction. It is highly unlikely there would be that many deaths from gunfire.
|
rosco
|
| Durgan wrote: |
There has been about 300 deaths in the USA and 18 in Canada, since the TAZER introduction. It is highly unlikely there would be that many deaths from gunfire. |
Please provide the source for that information - over what time-period is it talking? I frankly find it impossible to believe that more people are killed by Taser than by gunfire.
|
Durgan
|
| rosco wrote: | | Durgan wrote: |
There has been about 300 deaths in the USA and 18 in Canada, since the TAZER introduction. It is highly unlikely there would be that many deaths from gunfire. |
Please provide the source for that information - over what time-period is it talking? I frankly find it impossible to believe that more people are killed by Taser than by gunfire. |
Try Google. It's a great search engine.
|
rosco
|
| Durgan wrote: |
Try Google. It's a great search engine. |
Ho ho - I have actually heard of that site before! But it is usually the responsibility of the person making these claims to provide the evidence for them, not ask others to look it up (at least that is common etiquette that I have seen applied on other mailing lists).
What I am actually disagreeing most with is on what basis do you say that there are more deaths from Taser than by gunfire? I simply do not believe that assertion.
|
|
|
|